Thread:The Zog./@comment-24846733-20141111202746/@comment-25653892-20141121055637

The mega-douche thing could actually be somewhat important. You know the whole EF3 kerfuffle that apparently happened apparently? Vandalism and stuff is kinda douchey… You should keep that requirement IMO, but reword it heavily so it actually kinda makes sense :/

EmigaRaptor wrote:

No, it's the "Don't question the admins decisions".

It's silly, why would it be forbidden to openly discuss about one of the admins decisions? It can't work like that. I agree. According to da rules, admins are supposed to be treated mostly the same as any other user, just with a few more buttons and a bit more authority. For instance, admins aren't supposed to settle in-good-faith disputes and stuff like that. I don't think it would be very fair to have the admins' decisions be unquestionable; you should be able to know what someone is doing on a wikia and why. Again, remember the whole EF3 kerfuffle.