Thread:AgentMuffin/@comment-90.3.38.189-20150110143917/@comment-25653892-20150110182502

Sorry for replying so late, I just woke up a bit ago. Anyway. Er… 'K,


 * The thumbnail section is unneeded. Not only is it kind of irrelevant to the video, but you can see the thing already in the infobox. Infoboxes are sorta meant to store information that would clog up the article. A while ago, before it was locked for whatever reason, I found Mario's article in horrible disrepair. Part of the problem was just plain bad grammar, although there were a few other problems. The infobox for the page was filled with original joke content, most of it completely unrelated to SMG4, and some of the offending sections were about Mario's likes and dislikes. Scroll down the page and what do you see? More relevant, but less-inclusive, lists about Mario's likes and dislikes. It took time to move all that stuff to the infobox, but by the end of it, the article was a lot better already.
 * The plot section is fine I guess, but IMO a bit poorly-written. There are a few typos and errors too, which even the best of us make on occasion. Maybe it would be best just to do a bit of touching up to the plot.
 * The characters section… yeah it's kinda weird. Plenty of redlinks, pluralization mistake's, and a few unnecessary tangents, kinda like in that other thing I was thinking about for a second there, you know, the thing that was, uh… But hypocrisy aside, yeah. If a species may or may not appear as multiple characters, just say, for instance, "Bob-ombs", to be safe. If a character doesn't physically appear – like Santa, where he is only alluded to by people dressing as him – just don't list him. At SMG4 Wiki we don't have much to say about implied or mentioned characters due to the lack of continuity in the bloopers.