Thread:The Zog./@comment-25653892-20150611233137/@comment-4955311-20150630044911

83.112.34.170 wrote: AgentMuffin wrote: Yo zawg. You know dem hip galleries we gots in awl dem paijezz? because they kiiiinda suck, yo.

So yeah, look at pretty much any gallery on any page that has one, and it's usually gonna be pretty poorly constructed, captioned, the whole ball of wax as they say. I think we could use some stricter guidelines to make them look a bit more professional, if possible. Some stuff I've come up with here:


 * As has been said, we should only have actual screencaps from the bloopers, and no fanart except for officially "noticed" fanart (end-of-video shiz), when and where possible.
 * We could also try harder to take good screencaps, ones that actually show what's going on rather than random stuff filling up half the screen with no context, for those here who upload them.
 * More notable or important images go up to the actual article. Most of these pages are starving when it comes to pictures scattered around. Then again, we could draw the pivotal points from the content-filled galleries below. Oh, and images shouldn't be duplicated between an article and its gallery.
 * I think images could get some leeway in terms of commentary, because they aren't the main article space. On the other hand, people should start removing literary nonsense, nonsense nonsense, and all the complete, blatant stupidity from each caption.
 * As for quotes from the video in question that may seem like gibberish, just put quote marks around that stuff, guys.

Sound good? I think we should start paying more attention to the gallery sections and pages, because the points above need to be acted upon IMO. Spread the word if you agree, man. "Zawg": a cross between "Zog" and "swag"?

I'm joking! XD

There is no need to make a portmanteau of my name and swag, for my name is literally defined by sweg.