Thread:The Zog./@comment-5128040-20150426062158/@comment-24846733-20150426164904

86.198.124.212 wrote: The "Da Glitch" article is now protected. But couldn't we precise that the reference to A Glitch is a Glitch (already mentioned on the article) wasn't wanted by Thecaptain64 although SMG4 put it? That'd may solve the problem of Thecaptain who don't want this reference to be mentioned on the page. Then the protection of the article would maybe not be needed anymore. What's your opinion on this? It's not protected. What are blattering about?