User blog:The RPG Gamer/Why Mario is NOT Mental Part 2

Okay we're back, let's finish debunking the rest of this flawed theory. If you haven't seen Part 1 yet, "What are you even doing here?" I suggest you check out Part 1 first and come back here once you've gotten a bit more of a glimpse of this theory as this theory literally tries to destroy every part of Mario's character and everything he and the series stands for.

Mario Being a womanizer
MatPat basically claims that Mario is a womanizer because of Pauline and Daisy. This part has been debunked by MatPat himself due to believing that Jumpman is Mario's father which would make Pauline his mother. (let's just ignore that for a second), MatPat claims that Mario and Pauline are still in a relationship and that he's cheating on Peach. I mean you can break up with someone and still be just friends it happens a lot. MatPat then proceeds to say "Now, as a committed man myself I speak with authority that YOU DO NOT INVITE ANOTHER WOMAN AS YOUR DATE TO ANY SORT OF FUNCTION EVER! ESPECIALLY IF SHE'S A FORMER GIRLFRIEND!!"

It's funny how the guy that made this video is now all of a sudden talking about the importance of a relationship and being strictly autoriteric and as the Princess of the Mushroom Kingdom Peach has a lot of royal affairs (like in the Beanbean Kingdom) and a lot of royal business meetings when she isn't kidnapped so why can't Mario have a hobby and he need a assistant for the job. Also, yes she does say "Oh Mario my hero" well of course she's gonna say that because y'know he saved her from a giant gorilla wearing a red necktie) and this could also mean that Pauline may still have feelings for Mario but Mario may not feel the same.

Also, to further prove that Mario is cheating on Peach, MatPat pulls out a fanmade timeline that shows that the Mario VS Donkey Kong games took place in between New Super Mario Bros. and Super Mario RPG. The problem with this is that there is currently no official Mario timeline. And that the one he used was fanmade. So MatPat... YOU CAN'T USE IT AS EVIDENCE!! you can only use things that have been explicitly confirmed by Nintendo. Also, MatPat states there's a Mini Pauline toy but there's no Mini Peach toy to start off yes there is and it was created in 2006 whereas the Mini Pauline toy was created in 2010 and what's worse is that the Mini Peach toy appears IN THE FREAKING VIDEO. Geez how did MatPat not notice that. He would've had to watch the video a second time as he was editing it.

Then there's the whole matter with Daisy. Another part that has been debunked by MatPat himself as he now claims that Super Mario Land took place after every Mario game and that Luigi ends up getting Peach. The whole Mario saying Daisy's name twice after he saves her could mean two things (other than that he has feelings for her) 1. he's outta breath. or 2. he wants her attention as y'know I sometimes do that too. The hearts flying around is when Daisy kisses Mario like Peach always does. Notice how I said Daisy kisses Mario and not the other way around, Mario is just doing nothing as Daisy kisses him and MatPat claims that Mario forced Luigi to hook up with Daisy which isn't true, Daisy probably came to The Mushroom Kingdom and decided she had feelings for Luigi. Once again the timeline evidence can't be used as evidence as it is fanmade and that there's no official Mario timeline.

Mario killing Toads because they were trapped inside bricks
He claims that Mario is killing Toads because they were trapped inside bricks and when he hits them and yes I have read the instruction booklet and it does say that they were turned into bricks but the key word was right there, they were trapped in bricks not brick blocks now this may sound worse but every brick equals one Toad and there are ten bricks stuck together so when Mario hits them, he's actually separating them so they're not more together when they turn back this also explains why you get points for smashing them. You might argue that Mario mercilessly goes through the level with a Mega Mushroom crushing everything in his path and that this kills the Toads but no, the curse was only in the original Super Mario Bros. In every other game, they're just regular brick blocks. Also, did he ever consider that um...uh...I don't know...that MARIO MAY NOT BE AWARE OF THE CURSE!! Yeah, MatPat is making out like Mario is fully aware that he's supposedly killing Toads and destroying everything but he actually isn't and I have proof that he doesn't know about the curse and that is the movie Super Mario Bros.: The Quest to save Princess Peach which is a movie released only in Japan to celebrate the release of Super Mario Bros. 2 The Lost Levels. It is based off of the original Super Mario Bros. and there is a character (who looks like a character from Smurfs) called the Mushroom Hermit who appears and tells Mario and Luigi about the curse. This guy was there only way of knowing about the curse and since he never appears in the main Mario games as the movie isn't canon, then it goes to show that Mario doesn't know about the curse, also the brick blocks you encounter may not even be Toads we don't know for sure.

Mario killing enemies such as Goombas
Next MatPat claims that Mario is evil and a murderer for killing Goombas. Yes he does kill them but that's because their part of Bowser's Army and they're trying to kill him. Also, MatPat compares killing Goombas (which happens instantly) to a ancient form of torture from southeast Asia where an Elephant would crush someone killing them. He then uses the example of polices officers who are forced to kill questioning their actions and suffer from PTSD and that Mario is aroused by that and doesn't have second thoughts. PTSD is commonly started by killing another human and watching them die gruesomely. Mario enemies are not the same species as Mario and they don't die gruesomely they just explode, fall off screen, poof out of existence, or any other thing that isn't gruesome. Even the enemies that take multiple hits, they appear to be mores angry or mildly annoyed at Mario not so much suffering. Also, Luigi, Yellow Toad, Blue Toad, Nabbit, Toad, Peach, and Rosalina do the same thing as Mario in the New Super Mario Bros. games and Super Mario 3D Land and 3D World but we all know those characters are obviously not sociopaths. And really MatPat? You compare Mario to The Joker, Hannibal Lecter, Mr. Hyde, Ted Bundy, and Lumberjack Dexter. Actual psychopaths who kill people because they feel like it while Mario does it because he's practically forced to in order to save Peach and sometimes the universe and also because they're trying to kill him.

Conclusion
In this theory MatPat says instead of his famous catchphrase "It's just a theory a game theory" he says "I can definitively say that Mario has Antisocial Personality Disorder!" Which goes against what game theory is about and ever since this theory, many fans have been taking MatPat's theory's as fact (which is why I am doing this) alongside the fact that MatPat never shuts the fuck up about this theory.


 * In Legend of Zelda Majora's Mask is Pointless he has Mario running off with Pauline in the background and for no reason but to reference Mario is Mental.
 * In How Deadly is Mario's Bullet Bill, he constantly refers to Mario as "Everyone's favourite sociopath!"
 * In Toad's Deadly Secret (another flawed theory) he says that Bowser kidnapping Peach is him protecting her and Mario the greedy plumber comes to stop him." just to support the Mario is Mental theory
 * And in Mario Kart 8 is the deadliest game MatPat shows a mini clip of Mario standing on Luigi's foot from MPT and says "sociopathic" just to reference this video.
 * And in Rosalina Unmasked, he says that Mario is Mental is 100% fact.

After a while he did stop but then came across a certain video from January 22 2015 which was YouTubers react to Racist Mario by the Fine Bros. before they started trying to copyright react videos guess who was in the video at section 00:55: MatPat and he says and I quote "MARIO'S A PSYCHOPATH!!"

And as a result of MatPat being in that video and making that comment, tons and tons of game theory fans came on and said that MatPat was right and that Mario really was a sociopath because of Racist Mario even thought the video is fanmade and has nothing to do with the Mario games at all, the fact how MatPat brought up this theory again (and on a completely different channel) really got me angry...

Anyway I have done my part and proven that Mario doesn't have ASPD...