Thread:Pinkolol16/@comment-34296765-20141122025423/@comment-83.114.247.208-20141203135211

Pinkolol16 wrote: Just because I edit something doesn't mean I'm perfectly fine with the article. I'll fix it up temporarily, but I won't stay put if the article is useless.

I was skeptical on IJosh creating that as the only activity was that weird Mario page and that forum from August (there's probably more but those are what I know).

This is warranting the same excuse as the MM54 wiki.

In MM's videos, SQG4 relates to Glitchy4. But in SMG4's videos, such a thing is twisted and convoluted, possibly barely exists because SMG4 doesn't focus on storytelling but humour, which has obviously gotten him as far to us working on this wiki, but MM's videos could be considered fanfiction. Any other video series can be considered fanfiction unless SMG4 tells us that MM's continuity does link, and that his videos do link in, SQG4 does exist and all that. But SMG4 hasn't and probably won't do that because he's creating his own continuity merging elements of what he feels he wants to put in the videos. There could be 10,000+ different versions of Starman3, MarioMario, myself, SMG4, MM761, Enzo,  around, but the ones canon to the continuity of which we're describing are the ones we're describing. SMG4's videos link to his videos. MM's videos link to his own and SM3's. Nothing else fits unless they say so themselves. Ok? Ok.

Just because wikis are allies doesn't warrant pages being identical on both. If anything it's more of a knowledge that they're related anyway. Links that relate can go to either wiki, but links don't have to be forcefully created if there's no point on one side.

OK then should we keep that article or not?